The Battle of Small-Caps
Value vs. Growth Explained
"Why didn't you focus on the operational aspects of small caps?"
That was the feedback I received from Cas, my co-author, after publishing my last article on small caps. And he was right—I had missed the core question. How do these companies actually operate? What strategic choices determine their success or failure?
To be honest? I ran out of space in the previous article and cut operational details to stay within the limit. But that was a weak excuse. Time to set things straight.
Because let’s be real: small caps are often lumped together as high-risk growth stocks. But that’s a misconception. There are two fundamentally different types:
Value small-caps – Companies with solid earnings, low valuations, and a conservative strategy. Think of a family-owned construction firm that has performed steadily for decades.
Growth small-caps – Young, innovative businesses that take risks to achieve exponential growth. For example, an AI startup burning through cash to capture market share.
Time to dive deep—without format constraints. This time, an honest answer to Cas’ question and a practical guide for investors looking beyond the surface.
What’s the Difference in Definition?
Value small-cap stocks are the "hidden gems" of the stock market—smaller companies that appear undervalued based on fundamental metrics like low price-to-earnings or price-to-book ratios. They generally trade at bargain prices, often with higher dividend yields, but their growth tends to be slower. In other words, these are businesses that might be temporarily overlooked by the market or simply operate in less glamorous industries. Think of a niche manufacturing firm or a regional bank—solid businesses with steady cash flow but little hype. According to the Fama & French model, these stocks benefit from both the size factor (small market cap) and the value factor (low valuation). If the market re-evaluates their potential, they can experience major price appreciation. However, there’s a catch: they also carry a higher risk of financial distress.
Growth small-cap stocks, on the other hand, are the "high flyers." These are companies expected to expand revenue and earnings at a breakneck pace, often operating in cutting-edge industries or in an early growth phase. Because of this, they tend to have sky-high valuations—think elevated price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios. Unlike value small-caps, they rarely pay dividends, preferring to reinvest profits into expansion. The market essentially bets on their future potential rather than their current earnings, making them more volatile. These companies can soar when expectations are met but also crash hard when they disappoint.
Value and growth small-caps sit on opposite ends of the investment spectrum. Value stocks are often undervalued, with solid balance sheets and tangible assets, but they require patience. Growth stocks, on the other hand, are fueled by optimism and future promise, making them inherently riskier.
What’s the difference in Operations?
Capital management differs greatly between value and growth small-caps. Growth-oriented small-caps reinvest nearly all profits into R&D, expansion, or acquisitions instead of dividends. They often raise capital through stock issuance or venture financing, making them vulnerable when market conditions tighten.
Value small-caps take a more conservative approach, relying on internal financing. Since their stocks trade at lower valuations, they avoid issuing new shares and focus on debt reduction, dividends, or buybacks. They typically operate in mature industries, where large-scale expansion isn't necessary, allowing for steady cash flow management.
Growth small-caps maintain strong cash reserves for reinvestment but are more volatile due to their dependency on external funding. Value small-caps, while more stable, sometimes struggle with low valuations due to limited growth prospects or financial distress.
Value and growth small-caps are also not evenly spread across industries. Value small-caps are often found in finance, industrials, and energy. Small banks, insurers, real estate funds, and resource companies frequently have low price-to-book ratios and moderate growth. The Russell 2000 Value Index reflects this, with financials (25%) and industrials (14%) as top sectors. These industries are typically cyclical, asset-heavy, and trade at lower valuations.
Growth small-caps, on the other hand, dominate in technology, healthcare, and consumer trends. The Russell 2000 Growth Index is led by industrials (~23%) and healthcare (~21%), followed by technology and consumer discretionary. Biotech and medtech, for example, produce many growth stocks—think of a biotech startup with no profits but a promising drug. Similarly, tech startups and e-commerce players often fall into the growth category. In retail, growth could mean a booming online store, while value could be a struggling physical chain trading at a discount.
Simply put, growth thrives in innovation-driven sectors, while value clusters in traditional, cyclical industries. This sector bias matters: during the COVID-19 crisis, tech and communication (growth) outperformed, while banks and energy (value) struggled. Conversely, during economic recovery or rising interest rate environments, financials and industrials (value) often lead the rebound.
Globally, value and growth small-caps also vary by region. The U.S. has a strong tech sector, generating many small-cap growth stocks (Silicon Valley startups, biotech hubs). Europe and Japan lean more towards industrial and financial small-caps, making their markets more value-heavy. However, studies show the value-growth dynamic is universal, with similar premiums across developed markets.
In emerging markets, small-caps are often growth-driven, fueled by rising consumer demand. However, deep value opportunities also exist among underappreciated domestic firms. Value small-caps tend to be locally focused, such as a regional construction firm or a domestic bank, while growth small-caps scale internationally with niche products.
Whats the Difference in (Historical) Returns?
Over short periods, small-cap value and growth stocks can alternate in performance. In the past five years (2018–2023), value stocks dominated. According to S&P, the S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value Index returned +8.67% annually, compared to +2.56% for growth. The shift toward value was driven by a strong rebound in 2021–2022, while growth stocks suffered due to rising interest rates.
The large-cap segment showed a different trend—growth (big tech) led from 2017 to 2021, while small-cap growth stocks struggled post-pandemic, especially in 2022. Value small-caps recovered strongly in late 2020, benefiting from a rotation into cyclical stocks. Timing is crucial—different five-year periods show varying leaders, such as growth thriving after the euro crisis (2012–2017) and value outperforming after the dotcom crash (early 2000s).
Over longer periods (~20 years), small-cap value stocks have consistently outperformed growth stocks. Studies confirm a clear value premium in the small-cap segment. Data from Westwood shows that small-cap value outperformed growth over the two decades leading to 2020.
Since 1926, small-cap value stocks averaged 14.1% annually, versus 10% for the total market (Bridgeway).
From 1927 to 2022, U.S. value stocks delivered 4.4% higher annual returns than growth (Dimensional).
1997–2016: Russell 2000 Value Index outperformed Russell 2000 Growth (+9.7% vs. +6.3%), with lower risk (RBC Global Asset Management).
Internationally, the trend is similar. Since 1975, small-cap stocks outside the U.S. outperformed large-caps by 0.6% annually, and small-cap value exceeded the broad small-cap index by 4.8% per year (Pzena).
In the short term, small-cap value and growth stocks trade leadership based on economic cycles and market sentiment. Over 20+ years, value consistently wins, delivering higher long-term returns. This explains why small-cap value remains a cornerstone of factor investing. While past returns don’t guarantee future performance, historical data strongly supports the persistence of the value premium worldwide.
What’s the Difference in Risk?
Investing in small-cap stocks is never dull—they come with high-reward potential, but also plenty of pitfalls. Whether you’re looking at value or growth small-caps, each carries a unique set of risks. While all small-cap stocks are naturally more volatile and economically sensitive than their larger counterparts, the challenges they face differ significantly depending on their category.
Value small-caps often trade at a discount, but let’s be honest—not every bargain is a hidden gem. Some companies are cheap for a reason. They may be stuck in slow-growing industries, struggling with outdated business models, or weighed down by financial troubles that keep them from bouncing back. These so-called "value traps" can linger for years without anything to drive their stock price higher. Additionally, many value small-caps operate in cyclical sectors like finance, energy, and industrials, which means they can get hit hard during economic downturns. The COVID-19 crash in early 2020 made this painfully clear when the Russell 2000 Value Index tanked over 35% in just one quarter. On top of that, smaller companies generally have fewer financial resources, making bankruptcy a real risk during turbulent times. While diversification helps, patience is key—sometimes value stocks take longer than expected to pay off.
On the flip side, growth small-caps come with their own set of high-stakes risks. Unlike value stocks, which at least have solid earnings or assets to support their valuation, growth stocks are all about potential. That’s great—until they miss the mark. A failed product launch, regulatory roadblock, or unexpected competition can send their stock price plummeting. Many small-cap growth companies aren’t even profitable yet and rely on outside funding to stay afloat. When interest rates rise, borrowing becomes more expensive, and cash-hungry growth firms can struggle to secure financing. Some may be forced to issue more shares at lower prices, diluting current investors. And let’s not forget the boom-and-bust nature of market hype. During the dotcom era, many small-cap tech stocks skyrocketed—only to lose over 80% of their value when reality caught up. Even when a growth stock is successful, its early momentum can attract bigger, well-funded competitors who swoop in and steal market share, making it harder to sustain an advantage.
In short, value small-caps run the risk of being "cheap for a reason" and suffering from slow market recognition, while growth small-caps thrive on optimism but can collapse under pressure. Smart investors know that risk management is key—whether that means diversification, timing, or simply knowing when to hold and when to fold.
Closing remarks
The more I explored small-cap stocks, the clearer it became that success hinges on one key factor: whether a company falls into the "value" or "growth" category. Value small-caps, often found in industries like banking, energy, and manufacturing, attract me due to their stable cash flows and low valuations. However, not every low stock price is a hidden gem—some companies are genuinely struggling and remain undervalued for good reason.
On the other hand, growth small-caps—particularly in tech and biotech—are incredibly appealing due to their high growth potential. They can deliver spectacular returns in a short time, but I’ve also seen how quickly things can go south when market sentiment shifts or funding dries up. Timing and momentum seem to be crucial here.
What fascinates me is that neither style consistently wins. When the economy is booming and interest rates are low, growth stocks tend to soar. But long-term studies show that value small-caps generally outperform across multiple economic cycles. This confirms my belief that understanding and balancing both strategies is key. By thoroughly analyzing their operational strategies and factoring in economic conditions, I aim to strike a balance between potential and risk. My approach? Only investing in companies where I truly believe in their strategy, financial health, and industry outlook.
📢 What’s your take? Would you invest in Growth or Value? I’d love to hear your thoughts—drop a comment below and let’s discuss! 👇
🔔 Don’t miss out! This Sunday, we’re diving into the strengths & weaknesses of Aris Water Solutions. Stay tuned!
Please note: This article includes a disclaimer regarding investment advice.
Our Recent Posts
The Footprint of M&M in Corporate Finance
“You better cut the pizza in four pieces, because I'm not hungry enough to eat six.”
What Trump’s Next Move Could Mean for Aris Investors
I’m not a huge fan of macroeconomics when it comes to investing.
Should You Sell Your Smartphoto Shares?
Today, we’re not going to talk about Aris – our latest hidden gem, which we found through a top-down analysis. Instead, we’re diving deep into a company that’s close to our hearts (and not just because our portfolio sits in our breast pocket).